fortnight afterwards
assets was
It is
Scarcely
This omission be purely accidental.
worthwhile to answer
this letter, otherwise these two poinite might be again brought out and he might be told that the fermission was hoolded because it was
contrary
to the Secretary of State's instructions
This is an
CPL
९
20 June
nk
20 Jas.
wvasive letter.
Aumer that with regard of the last
his litter
par. of Старит
nan
that the Cable
revoked under Lad
kimbaby's intructions
as
The grant
the
nas contrary of the spint of Telegram despatched to him an
hub 11. Kimberly
a and that Lond
refrain from
E.CL. 24/6-82
307
Exprepsing his surprize that be should not have thright in
weer pary fly to explain the wiser in which prim
to the reempty the telepam, he had already given
company jimminpally interested in the whoh guntion
of telepaphs importants concepion of
an
Ch
Kindred charactes.
RM 24/6
this secure is that the had given
adens
for
the letters & sinter
uptodate being havrothed and the presunus they
nitted 5
auright -
But having granted the comifing sunly the should have Explained the mother
w
have rated satisfied to hate the do. of thate the "that something different ther
to writed bud
keen done by perusing intorang 4 - despatele itul
$
the met.
past
En
I would drop the subject; if it is thought. that these can be sour. Resett hem 23.
drop
K June 20
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.